Recent Heated Exchanges in the Supreme Court.

​As of April 2, 2025, there are no reports of heated exchanges involving the Supreme Court of India reprimanding an advocate for vexatious litigation. However, a notable incident occurred on July 23, 2024, during the NEET-UG 2024 proceedings. Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud had a heated exchange with advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara, who repeatedly interrupted the court and demanded to present his arguments out of turn. The CJI firmly warned Nedumpara that he would be removed from the courtroom if he continued his behavior, emphasizing that he would not allow any lawyer to dictate the court’s procedure .​

Addressing vexatious litigation, the Supreme Court has previously underscored the importance of curbing such practices to ensure an effective justice system. In Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, the Court highlighted that frivolous claims cause unnecessary suffering to innocent parties and constitute an abuse of the judicial process .​

While there are no recent incidents as of today, these examples illustrate the Court’s commitment to maintaining decorum and addressing vexatious litigation.​

Favicon
Favicon
Favicon
Favicon

Sources

SupremeCourt #VexatiousLitigation #CourtroomDrama #JudicialIntegrity #PublicInterestLitigation #LegalEthics #SCIndia #CJIChandrachud #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary#SupremeCourt #VexatiousLitigation #CourtroomDrama #JudicialIntegrity #PublicInterestLitigation #LegalEthics #SCIndia #CJIChandrachud #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary #LawAndJustice #FrivolousPILs #CourtroomConduct #AdvocatesMisconduct #JusticeForAll #RuleOfLaw #LegalDiscipline #BarAndBench #SCVerdicts #LegalAwareness #PILAbuse #EthicalLawyering #JudicialAccountability #LegalSystem #LawyersEthics #SupremeCourtRulings #JusticePrevails #MisuseOfLaw #CourtroomEtiquette #SCJudgment

Scroll to Top